| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: moving from contrib to bin |
| Date: | 2014-12-12 13:13:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20141212131354.GF31413@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-12-12 15:11:01 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 12/12/2014 03:07 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >On 12/9/14 4:10 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>Maybe it makes sense to have a distinction between client programs and
> >>server programs. Can we have src/sbin/ and move stuff that involves the
> >>server side in there? I think that'd be pg_xlogdump, pg_archivecleanup,
> >>pg_upgrade, pg_test_timing, pg_test_fsync. (If we were feeling bold we
> >>could also move pg_resetxlog, pg_controldata and initdb there.)
> >
> >I was thinking about that. What do others think?
>
> Sounds good. We already separate server and client programs in the docs, and
> packagers put them in different packages too. This should make packagers'
> life a little bit easier in the long run.
Wouldn't a make install-server/client targets or something similar
actually achieve the same thing? Seems simpler to maintain to me.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-12-12 13:19:59 | Re: PATCH: hashjoin - gracefully increasing NTUP_PER_BUCKET instead of batching |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-12-12 13:13:44 | Re: moving from contrib to bin |