From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: GSSAPI, SSPI - include_realm default |
Date: | 2014-12-11 01:44:06 |
Message-ID: | 20141211014406.GV25679@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Peter Eisentraut (peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net) wrote:
> On 12/9/14 5:40 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I agree with this but I don't really see why we wouldn't say "hey, this
> > is going to change in 9.5."
>
> Well, for one thing, we don't even know if it's going to be called 9.5. ;-)
Now that is certainly a very good point.
> And there is always a chance for a technical reason popping up that we
> might not make the change after all in 9.5.
I suppose.
> I'd be fine with something more along the lines of "the default might
> change in the future ... if you want to be future-proof, set it explicitly".
Sure, that'd work for me.
> Let's see an actual patch.
Will do. Might be a few days before I get to it but I don't think
there's any cause for rush anyway.
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2014-12-11 01:50:44 | double vacuum in initdb |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-12-11 01:32:49 | Re: On partitioning |