| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mart Kelder <mart(at)kelder31(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Removing INNER JOINs |
| Date: | 2014-12-03 15:06:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20141203150655.GA3342@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Stephen Frost (sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net) wrote:
> * Atri Sharma (atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > So the planner keeps all possibility satisfying plans, or it looks at the
> > possible conditions (like presence of foreign key for this case, for eg)
> > and then lets executor choose between them?
>
> Right, this was one of the thoughts that I had.
Erm, "I had also". Don't mean to imply that it was all my idea or
something silly like that.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Миша Тюрин | 2014-12-03 15:14:26 | Re: [HACKERS] On partitioning |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-12-03 15:02:26 | Re: Removing INNER JOINs |