Re: superuser() shortcuts

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: superuser() shortcuts
Date: 2014-11-21 15:12:40
Message-ID: 20141121151240.GB28859@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Andres Freund (andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> I still think this change makes the error message more verbose, without
> any win in clarity.

Can we agree that there should be consistency? I'm not really
particular about which way we go with the specific wording (suggestions
welcome..) but the inconsistency should be dealt with.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2014-11-21 15:14:21 make installcheck.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-11-21 15:06:04 Re: Functions used in index definitions shouldn't be changed