Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS
Date: 2014-11-13 23:00:45
Message-ID: 20141113230045.GI28859@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Stephen Frost (sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net) wrote:
> I'm happy to fix it either way (and fix it for 8.1, and back to.. what?
> Postgres95?)

Err. That might have come off poorly- I didn't mean that sarcastically
but was really wondering how far back you test (or how far back we
feel pg_dumpall needs to work against..). I was originally going to say
7.4, but then figured we might try to go back farther than even that
and, well, Postgres95 is the oldest we have "easy" access to..

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-11-13 23:15:20 Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-11-13 22:41:13 Re: Missing FIN_CRC32 calls in logical replication code