| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: numeric_normalize() is a few bricks shy of a load |
| Date: | 2014-11-06 00:34:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20141106003442.GR28859@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> I think there's no choice but to fix this in 9.4. The only reason
> it even needs discussion is that this would invalidate index entries
> in beta testers' JSONB GIN indexes, such that queries would not find
> entries that they did find before. I'm not sure we can do anything
> about this except recommend that beta testers REINDEX such indexes
> after updating to 9.4next.
>
> Thoughts?
I'm not happy about it, but I agree with your assessment. Beta testers
will survive (not exaclty the first time they've had to deal with such
changes..). We surely can't ship it as-is.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2014-11-06 01:00:53 | Re: recovery_target_time and standby_mode |
| Previous Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2014-11-06 00:33:29 | Re: B-Tree index builds, CLUSTER, and sortsupport |