Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic File Access Functions

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Brightwell, Adam" <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic File Access Functions
Date: 2014-10-18 02:02:04
Message-ID: 20141018020204.GB25696@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:01:28PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> This started out as a request for a non-superuser to be able to review
> the log files without needing access to the server. Now, things can
> certainly be set up on the server to import *all* logs and then grant
> access to a non-superuser, but generally it's "I need to review the log
> from X to Y" and not *all* logs need to be stored or kept in PG.

Why is this patch showing up before being discussed? You are having to
back into the discusion because of this.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-10-18 02:10:34 Re: Optimizer on sort aggregate
Previous Message Feng Tian 2014-10-18 01:25:14 Re: Optimizer on sort aggregate