| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Hash index creation warning |
| Date: | 2014-10-17 18:36:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20141017183655.GB32673@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:56:52PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > The question is whether we explain the implications of not being WAL-logged
> > in an error message or simply state the fact and let the documentation
> > explain the hazards - basically just output:
> > "hash indexes are not WAL-logged and their use is discouraged"
>
> +1. The warning message is not the place to be trying to explain all the
> details.
OK, updated patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| hash.diff | text/x-diff | 8.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | CK Tan | 2014-10-17 18:52:32 | Re: Vitesse DB call for testing |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-10-17 18:35:55 | Re: Vitesse DB call for testing |