From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Jan Lentfer <Jan(dot)Lentfer(at)web(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
Subject: | Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ] |
Date: | 2014-10-17 13:05:22 |
Message-ID: | 20141017130522.GB7246@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On 16 October 2014 15:09, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > c) seems like the only issue that needs any thought. I don't think its
> > going to be that hard.
> >
> > I don't see any problems with the other points. You can make a
> > function wait, if you wish.
>
> It is quite possible, but still I think to accomplish such a function,
> we need to have some mechanism where it can inform auto vacuum
> and then some changes in auto vacuum to receive/read that information
> and reply back. I don't think any such mechanism exists.
You're right, it doesn't. I think we have plenty more infrastructure
for that than we had when autovacuum was initially developed. It
shouldn't be that hard.
Of course, this is a task that requires much more thinking, design, and
discussion than just adding multi-process capability to vacuumdb ...
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2014-10-17 13:12:06 | Re: BUG: *FF WALs under 9.2 (WAS: .ready files appearing on slaves) |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-10-17 13:00:45 | Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ] |