Re: Code bug or doc bug?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Code bug or doc bug?
Date: 2014-10-13 16:17:54
Message-ID: 20141013161754.GZ21267@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 06:39:21AM -0700, David G Johnston wrote:
> > Is there a doc patch to make here?
>
> 1. Last sentence change suggestion: "The target tablespace must be empty."
>
> 2. Based on Robert's comments it sounds like a "You cannot change the
> default tablespace of the current database." comment should be added as
> well.
>
> Side note: I have no clue what the "mapped relations" Robert refers to
> are...

I have created the attached doc patch for this. Should we backpatch
this through 9.0, or just 9.4?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
tablespace.diff text/x-diff 1.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-10-13 17:04:45 Re: Hide 'Execution time' in EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-10-13 15:57:21 Re: [9.4 bug] The database server hangs with write-heavy workload on Windows