| From: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
| Cc: | hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Escaping from blocked send() reprised. |
| Date: | 2014-10-10 06:48:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20141010.154856.252680989.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hmm.. Sorry for my stupidity.
> Why is that necessary? It seems really rather wrong to make
> BIO_set_retry_write() dependant on ProcDiePending? Especially as, at
> least in my testing, it's not even required because the be_tls_write()
> can just check the error properly?
I mistook the previous conversation as it doesn't work as
expected. I confirmed that it works fine.
After all, it works as I expected. The parameter for
ProcessClientWriteInterrupt() looks somewhat uneasy but the patch
4 looks fine as a whole. Do you have anything to worry about in
the patch?
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-10-10 06:58:13 | Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2014-10-10 04:51:25 | Re: [9.4 bug] The database server hangs with write-heavy workload on Windows |