Re: pg_background (and more parallelism infrastructure patches)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_background (and more parallelism infrastructure patches)
Date: 2014-10-08 22:41:15
Message-ID: 20141008224115.GA7829@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-10-08 15:03:01 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> #1 - Just committed, per discussion last week.
> #2 - No comments, possibly because it's pretty boring.

fine with me.

> #3 - Most people seem happy with v2, modulo the above renaming request.

If you do it without the error handling stuff, I'm good with committing
it. I'm not yet convinced that verbatimly rethrowing errors from
background workers without any indications that the process changed is a
good idea.

> #4 - No comments.

This needs review imo.

> #5 - No comments; trivial.

fine.

> #6 - Updated per Amit's feedback. Not sure if anyone else wants to
> review. Still needs docs.

This definitely needs more view.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-10-08 22:51:55 Re: UPSERT wiki page, and SQL MERGE syntax
Previous Message Marti Raudsepp 2014-10-08 22:36:12 Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers