Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mark Wong <mark(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
Date: 2014-10-01 19:04:25
Message-ID: 20141001190425.GE7158@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-10-01 20:54:39 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> Here we go.
>
> Postgres was configured with.
> -c shared_buffers=8GB \
> -c log_line_prefix="[%m %p] " \
> -c log_min_messages=debug1 \
> -p 5440 \
> -c checkpoint_segments=600
> -c max_connections=200

Robert reminded me that I missed to report the hardware aspect of
this...

4x E5-4620 @ 2.20GHz: 32 cores, 64 threads
256GB RAM

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-10-01 19:06:23 Re: "Value locking" Wiki page
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-10-01 19:03:26 Re: "Value locking" Wiki page