From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, "Brightwell, Adam" <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Yeb Havinga <yeb(dot)havinga(at)portavita(dot)nl> |
Subject: | Re: WITH CHECK OPTION bug [was RLS Design] |
Date: | 2014-09-23 00:24:21 |
Message-ID: | 20140923002421.GD16422@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Dean Rasheed (dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> Yeah OK, fair point. Here are some tests that cover that code path.
> I've also thrown in a test with prepared statements, although that
> case was already working, it seemed worth checking.
Applied and backpatched, thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-09-23 00:51:01 | Re: Should we excise the remnants of borland cc support? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-09-22 23:56:12 | Re: Yet another abort-early plan disaster on 9.3 |