From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Should we excise the remnants of borland cc support? |
Date: | 2014-09-22 23:48:55 |
Message-ID: | 20140922234855.GE2521@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-09-20 10:03:43 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 09/20/2014 09:24 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >At the moment there's some rememnants of support for borland CC. I don't
> >believe it's likely that any of it still works. I can't remember ever
> >seing a buildfarm animal running it either - not surprising it's ~15
> >years since the last release.
> >Since there's both msvc and mingw support for windows builds - borlands
> >only platform - I see little point in continuing to support it.
> >
> >The reason I'm wondering is that the atomics patch cargo cults forward
> >some stuff specific to borland and I'd rather not do that. And I'd
> >rather be explicit about stopping to do so than slyly doing it.
> >
>
> I thought the Borland stuff was there only so we could build client
> libraries for use with things like Delphi.
>
> It might be worth casting the net a little wider to find out if it still has
> any users.
FWIW I got offlist reports of two not subscribed people that they simply
use the normal libpq dll from delphi. Copying it from pgadmin or the pg
installer.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-09-22 23:56:12 | Re: Yet another abort-early plan disaster on 9.3 |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-09-22 23:46:14 | Re: Should we excise the remnants of borland cc support? |