Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Matthew Kelly <mkelly(at)tripadvisor(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Matthew Spilich <mspilich(at)tripadvisor(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps
Date: 2014-09-17 18:04:53
Message-ID: 20140917180452.GC28976@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 01:07:56PM +0000, Matthew Kelly wrote:
> I'm with Martjin here, lets go ICU, if only because it moves sorting
> to a user level library, instead of a system level. Martjin do you
> have a link to the out of tree patch? If not I'll find it. I'd like
> to apply it to a branch and start playing with it.

http://people.freebsd.org/~girgen/postgresql-icu/README.html
http://people.freebsd.org/~girgen/postgresql-icu/

Note I said optional. It is a large library for sure, but for some
installations I think the benefits are sufficient.

Mvg,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> He who writes carelessly confesses thereby at the very outset that he does
> not attach much importance to his own thoughts.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-09-17 18:05:11 Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-09-17 17:59:04 Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps