| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Built-in binning functions |
| Date: | 2014-09-07 19:09:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20140907190926.GB32055@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-09-07 15:05:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom, are you planning to take this one?
>
> Yeah, I already looked at it once, so will take it.
Cool.
> I think the main remaining issue is that we don't have consensus on
> the function name AFAICT. I'm okay with using width_bucket(), as
> is done in the latest patch, but there were objections ...
Just reread that part of the thread and personally I disliked all the
other suggested names more than width_bucket.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2014-09-07 19:23:34 | Re: Adding a nullable DOMAIN column w/ CHECK |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-09-07 19:05:35 | Re: Built-in binning functions |