Re: BUG #11335: an invalid prepare statement causes crash at log_statement = 'mod' or 'ddl'.

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, TAKATSUKA Haruka <harukat(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #11335: an invalid prepare statement causes crash at log_statement = 'mod' or 'ddl'.
Date: 2014-09-06 20:34:10
Message-ID: 20140906203410.GK26947@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 2014-09-06 16:25:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Thanks for reporting the bug! This segmentation fault could reproduce
> >> even on my machine. Barring any objection, I will apply the change that
> >> you suggested.
>
> > Done.
>
> I don't think this fix is either appropriate or adequate.

Agreed (and commented offlist. Which probably was a mistake).

> Or maybe we should reconsider whether
> exec_parse_message should allow the case at all. It's not unreasonable
> that Parse should require exactly one SQL statement, not just "at most
> one".

I think this is the best bet. There really doesn't seem much
justification for the current "at most one" definition. At least not one
that I could find or think of. The likelihood of leaving some places
unfixed or new breakages creeping in seems non-nil; it's not what one
would immediately expect.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message chenchuanling 2014-09-07 01:05:08 BUG #11365: denied apache cgi connect
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-09-06 20:25:28 Re: BUG #11335: an invalid prepare statement causes crash at log_statement = 'mod' or 'ddl'.