Re: PL/pgSQL 2

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Date: 2014-09-02 13:10:14
Message-ID: 20140902131014.GC27095@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-09-02 14:41:03 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> On 9/2/14 2:29 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >In the mailing list thread that you linked there, Tom suggested using
> >"STRICT UPDATE ..." to mean that updating 0 or >1 rows is an error
> >(http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/16397.1356106923@sss.pgh.pa.us)
> >What happened to that proposal?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/27477.1361916222@sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> I can't find Peter's email right now, but basically nobody liked the
> suggestion in the end.

Perhaps we need the ONE ROW operatation ;)

ONE ROW UPDATE ...;

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2014-09-02 13:12:59 Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2014-09-02 13:08:55 Re: PL/pgSQL 2