Re: PL/pgSQL 2

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Date: 2014-09-01 13:25:14
Message-ID: 20140901132514.GF20990@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-09-01 15:19:41 +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > It bad signal to have two languages plpgsql and plpgsql2. Who will believe
> > to us so we will continue development of plpgsql?
>
> Depends on how you define "development".
> Bugfixes of plpgsql? Yes, of course.
> New features? No, but that's a non-issue since we all know it's more
> or less impossible to introduce new features without breaking
> compatibility, I think you will agree on that, no?

Sorry, but that's just plain wrong. There've been plenty of new features
for plpgsql. You're not very convincing if you use bogus arguments like
this.

EOD for me.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2014-09-01 13:41:45 Re: psql \watch versus \timing
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2014-09-01 13:19:41 Re: PL/pgSQL 2