Re: [DOCS] suggestion about SEO on www.postgresql.org/docs

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Antony <antony(at)cantoute(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] suggestion about SEO on www.postgresql.org/docs
Date: 2014-08-27 15:00:12
Message-ID: 20140827150012.GM14956@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-www

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 08:32:21PM +0200, Antony wrote:
>
>
>
> May I suggest that on the documentation on the current version (now 9.3) is added a link rel=canonical
>
> Ex:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/
>
> could have
>
> <link rel="canonical" href="http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/" />
>
> I believe this could help google offering the current documentation as a first choice.
> Right now it probably considers it as a duplicated content.
>
> Probably not the right place to tell this, but could’t guess who to send this to.

Are we using the rel="canonical" suggestion in our web docs now?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2014-08-30 16:33:03 Re: [PATCH] Various documentation typo/grammar fixes
Previous Message Marti Raudsepp 2014-08-26 18:54:29 Re: [PATCH] Various documentation typo/grammar fixes

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dhimiter Papajani 2014-09-01 01:25:48 PostgreSQL Graduate School Project
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2014-08-27 10:41:55 Re: Missing archive entry?