From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Antony <antony(at)cantoute(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [DOCS] suggestion about SEO on www.postgresql.org/docs |
Date: | 2014-08-27 15:00:12 |
Message-ID: | 20140827150012.GM14956@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-www |
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 08:32:21PM +0200, Antony wrote:
>
>
>
> May I suggest that on the documentation on the current version (now 9.3) is added a link rel=canonical
>
> Ex:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/
>
> could have
>
> <link rel="canonical" href="http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/" />
>
> I believe this could help google offering the current documentation as a first choice.
> Right now it probably considers it as a duplicated content.
>
> Probably not the right place to tell this, but could’t guess who to send this to.
Are we using the rel="canonical" suggestion in our web docs now?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2014-08-30 16:33:03 | Re: [PATCH] Various documentation typo/grammar fixes |
Previous Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2014-08-26 18:54:29 | Re: [PATCH] Various documentation typo/grammar fixes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dhimiter Papajani | 2014-09-01 01:25:48 | PostgreSQL Graduate School Project |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2014-08-27 10:41:55 | Re: Missing archive entry? |