Re: Code bug or doc bug?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Code bug or doc bug?
Date: 2014-08-27 13:19:55
Message-ID: 20140827131955.GJ14956@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 09:05:41AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Another idea is to have a command that you can run, while connected to
> a particular database, that updates the default tablespace for that
> database without actually moving any data on disk - i.e. it sets
> pg_database.dattablespace, and then updates every pg_class row where
> reltablespace = 0 to the old default tablespace, and pg_class row
> where reltablespace = the new tablespace ID to 0. Then you can move
> individual relations afterwards if you feel like it. But that might
> still require a lot of locks, and I think we also have a limitation
> that some relations (the mapped ones?) have to be in the database's
> default tablespace, which obviously wouldn't work here.
>
> So it's a tricky problem.

Is there a doc patch to make here?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-08-27 13:20:45 Re: postgresql latency & bgwriter not doing its job
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-08-27 13:19:15 Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1