Re: SSL renegotiation

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSL renegotiation
Date: 2014-08-26 03:46:13
Message-ID: 20140826034613.GB6343@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On 2013-11-15 10:43:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Another reason I'm not in a hurry is that the problem we're trying
> >> to solve doesn't seem to be causing real-world trouble. So by
> >> "awhile", I'm thinking "let's let it get through 9.4 beta testing".
>
> > Well, there have been a bunch of customer complaints about it, afair
> > that's what made Alvaro look into it in the first place. So it's not a
> > victimless bug.
>
> OK, then maybe end-of-beta is too long. But how much testing will it get
> during development? I know I never use SSL on development installs.
> How many hackers do?

Just a reminder that I intend to backpatch this (and subsequent fixes).
We've gone over two 9.4 betas now. Maybe it'd be a good thing if the
beta3 announcement carried a note about enabling SSL with a low
ssl_renegotiation_limit setting.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2014-08-26 04:35:33 Re: SSL renegotiation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-08-26 02:19:09 pgsql: pg_upgrade: prevent automatic oid assignment

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-08-26 04:05:43 Re: postgresql latency & bgwriter not doing its job
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-08-26 03:44:43 Re: Concurrently option for reindexdb