Re: Sample archive_command is still problematic

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sample archive_command is still problematic
Date: 2014-08-21 19:20:59
Message-ID: 20140821192059.GA17771@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:52:07AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 08/20/2014 04:12 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:27:47AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> I'd also like to mention pg_receivexlog, Barman, WAL-E, and RepMgr as
> >> external utilites and alternatives.
> >
> > Yes, please! We need to give users on what else is available, and the
> > strengths of each.
> >
>
> Well, I think putting an *evaluation* of the technologies there would be
> problematic, because the docs change very slowly and outside tech
> changes fast. I was just going to post "take a look at these examples".

OK. I personally would like to know the strengths of each. Is that
documented anywhere?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2014-08-21 21:05:19 Re: Sample archive_command is still problematic
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2014-08-21 18:52:07 Re: Sample archive_command is still problematic