From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J]" <KBaker9(at)its(dot)jnj(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2014-08-20 23:33:38 |
Message-ID: | 20140820233338.GA21584@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-07-25 18:29:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > * QNX lacks sigaction SA_RESTART: I modified "src/include/port.h" to define macros to retry system calls upon EINTR (open,read,write,...) when compiled on QNX
>
> That's pretty scary too. For one thing, such macros would affect every
> call site whether it's running with SA_RESTART or not. Do you really
> need it? It looks to me like we just turn off HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS if
> you don't have SA_RESTART. Maybe that code has bit-rotted by now, but
> it did work at one time.
I have pretty much no trust that we're maintaining
!HAVE_POSIX_SIGNAL. And none that we have that capability of doing so. I
seriously doubt there's any !HAVE_POSIX_SIGNAL animals and
873ab97219caabeb2f7b390268a4fe01e2b7518c makes it pretty darn unlikely
that we have much chance of finding such mistakes during development.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2014-08-20 23:35:17 | Re: Verbose output of pg_dump not show schema name |
Previous Message | Claudio Freire | 2014-08-20 23:33:20 | Re: [PATCH] Incremental backup: add backup profile to base backup |