Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Date: 2014-08-19 14:38:14
Message-ID: 20140819143814.GB30693@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-08-19 10:33:29 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> > Barring objections or better ideas, I'm leaning towards
> > XLogReadBufferForRedo.
>
> WFM

for me too. Although we could imo strip the 'XLog' in the beginning if
we want to make it shorter. The ForRedo is saying that pretty much.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2014-08-19 14:48:41 Re: PQgetssl() and alternative SSL implementations
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-08-19 14:33:29 Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)