Re: proposal for 9.5: monitoring lock time for slow queries

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal for 9.5: monitoring lock time for slow queries
Date: 2014-08-18 05:42:19
Message-ID: 20140818054219.GB8062@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2014-08-13 15:22 GMT+02:00 MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> > I didn't mean performance statistics data to be stored in database tables.
> > I just meant:
> >
> > * pg_stat_system_events is a view to show data on memory, which returns
> > one row for each event across the system. This is similar to
> > V$SYSTEM_EVENT in Oracle.
> >
> > * pg_stat_session_events is a view to show data on memory, which returns
> > one row for each event on one session. This is similar to V$SESSION_EVENT
> > in Oracle.
> >
> > * The above views represent the current accumulated data like other
> > pg_stat_xxx views.
> >
> > * EXPLAIN ANALYZE and auto_explain shows all events for one query. The
> > lock waits you are trying to record in the server log is one of the events.
>
> I am little bit sceptic about only memory based structure. Is it this
> concept acceptable for commiters?

Is this supposed to be session-local data, or is it visible from remote
sessions too? How durable is it supposed to be? Keep in mind that in
case of a crash, all pgstats data is erased.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2014-08-18 06:19:27 Re: psql \watch versus \timing
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-08-18 05:38:06 Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots