From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal for 9.5: monitoring lock time for slow queries |
Date: | 2014-08-18 05:42:19 |
Message-ID: | 20140818054219.GB8062@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2014-08-13 15:22 GMT+02:00 MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> > I didn't mean performance statistics data to be stored in database tables.
> > I just meant:
> >
> > * pg_stat_system_events is a view to show data on memory, which returns
> > one row for each event across the system. This is similar to
> > V$SYSTEM_EVENT in Oracle.
> >
> > * pg_stat_session_events is a view to show data on memory, which returns
> > one row for each event on one session. This is similar to V$SESSION_EVENT
> > in Oracle.
> >
> > * The above views represent the current accumulated data like other
> > pg_stat_xxx views.
> >
> > * EXPLAIN ANALYZE and auto_explain shows all events for one query. The
> > lock waits you are trying to record in the server log is one of the events.
>
> I am little bit sceptic about only memory based structure. Is it this
> concept acceptable for commiters?
Is this supposed to be session-local data, or is it visible from remote
sessions too? How durable is it supposed to be? Keep in mind that in
case of a crash, all pgstats data is erased.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-08-18 06:19:27 | Re: psql \watch versus \timing |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-08-18 05:38:06 | Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots |