From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Sample LDIF for pg_service.conf no longer works |
Date: | 2014-08-16 03:31:03 |
Message-ID: | 20140816033103.GB361872@tornado.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
When using pg_service.conf with LDAP, we document[1] the following sample LDIF
for populating the LDAP server:
version:1
dn:cn=mydatabase,dc=mycompany,dc=com
changetype:add
objectclass:top
objectclass:groupOfUniqueNames
cn:mydatabase
uniqueMember:host=dbserver.mycompany.com
uniqueMember:port=5439
uniqueMember:dbname=mydb
uniqueMember:user=mydb_user
uniqueMember:sslmode=require
That presumably worked at one point, but OpenLDAP 2.4.23 and OpenLDAP 2.4.39
both reject it cryptically:
ldap_add: Invalid syntax (21)
additional info: uniqueMember: value #0 invalid per syntax
uniqueMember is specified to bear a distinguished name. While OpenLDAP does
not verify that uniqueMember values correspond to known DNs, it does verify
that the value syntactically could be a DN. To give examples, "o=foobar" is
always accepted, but "xyz=foobar" is always rejected: "xyz" is not an LDAP DN
attribute type. Amid the LDAP core schema, "device" is the best-fitting
objectClass having the generality required. Let's convert to that, as
attached. I have verified that this works end-to-end.
Thanks,
nm
[1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/libpq-ldap.html
--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
ldif-sample-device-v1.patch | text/plain | 1.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Arthur Silva | 2014-08-16 06:04:22 | Re: jsonb format is pessimal for toast compression |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2014-08-16 03:26:55 | Re: strncpy is not a safe version of strcpy |