Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Date: 2014-08-13 17:51:24
Message-ID: 20140813175124.GM5728@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> Here's a full version of this refactoring patch, all the rmgr's have
> now been updated to use XLogReplayBuffer(). I think this is a
> worthwhile change on its own, even if we drop the ball on the rest
> of the WAL format patch, because it makes the redo-routines more
> readable. I propose to commit this as soon as someone has reviewed
> it, and we agree on a for what's currently called
> XLogReplayBuffer(). I have tested this with my page-image comparison
> tool.

XLogReadBufferForReplay ?
ReadBufferForXLogReplay ?

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-08-13 18:04:18 Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Previous Message Claudio Freire 2014-08-13 17:41:48 Re: jsonb format is pessimal for toast compression