Re: text search: restricting the number of parsed words in headline generation

FYI, I have kept this email from 2011 about poor performance of parsed
words in headline generation. If someone wants to research it, please
do so:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1314117620.3700.12.camel@dragflick

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:31:42PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Sushant Sinha <sushant354(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> Doesn't this force the headline to be taken from the first N words of
> >> the document, independent of where the match was? That seems rather
> >> unworkable, or at least unhelpful.
>
> > In headline generation function, we don't have any index or knowledge of
> > where the match is. We discover the matches by first tokenizing and then
> > comparing the matches with the query tokens. So it is hard to do
> > anything better than first N words.
>
> After looking at the code in wparser_def.c a bit more, I wonder whether
> this patch is doing what you think it is. Did you do any profiling to
> confirm that tokenization is where the cost is? Because it looks to me
> like the match searching in hlCover() is at least O(N^2) in the number
> of tokens in the document, which means it's probably the dominant cost
> for any long document. I suspect that your patch helps not so much
> because it saves tokenization costs as because it bounds the amount of
> effort spent in hlCover().
>
> I haven't tried to do anything about this, but I wonder whether it
> wouldn't be possible to eliminate the quadratic blowup by saving more
> state across the repeated calls to hlCover(). At the very least, it
> shouldn't be necessary to find the last query-token occurrence in the
> document from scratch on each and every call.
>
> Actually, this code seems probably flat-out wrong: won't every
> successful call of hlCover() on a given document return exactly the same
> q value (end position), namely the last token occurrence in the
> document? How is that helpful?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +