Re: pg_ctl non-idempotent behavior change

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl non-idempotent behavior change
Date: 2014-08-04 21:07:47
Message-ID: 20140804210747.GM5475@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > After 87306184580c9c49717, if the postmaster dies without cleaning up (i.e.
> > power outage), running "pg_ctl start" just gives this message and then
> > exits:
>
> > pg_ctl: another server might be running
>
> > Under the old behavior, it would try to start the server anyway, and
> > succeed, then go through recovery and give you back a functional system.
>
> > From reading the archive, I can't really tell if this change in behavior
> > was intentional.
>
> Hmm. I rather thought we had agreed not to change the default behavior,
> but the commit message fairly clearly says that the default behavior is
> being changed. This case shows that that change was inadequately
> thought through.
>
> > Anyway it seems like a bad thing to me. Now the user has a system that
> > will not start up, and is given no clue that they need to remove
> > "postmaster.pid" and try again.
>
> Yeah, this is not tolerable. We could think about improving the logic
> to have a stronger check on whether the old server is really there or
> not (ie it should be doing something more like pg_ping and less like
> just checking if the pidfile is there). But given how close we are to
> beta, maybe the best thing is to revert that change for now and put it
> back on the to-think-about-for-9.4 list. Peter?

Are we going to unrevert this patch for 9.5?

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Cochran 2014-08-04 21:40:06 Re: Looked at TODO:Considering improving performance of computing CHAR() value lengths
Previous Message testman1316 2014-08-04 20:48:32 PostrgeSQL vs oracle doing 1 million sqrts am I doing it wrong?