Re: Is there a way to temporarily disable a index

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is there a way to temporarily disable a index
Date: 2014-07-11 15:23:53
Message-ID: 20140711152353.GB11292@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-07-11 11:20:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On 2014-07-11 11:07:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Hacking pg_index.indisvalid could work, given a reasonably recent PG.
> >> I would not try it in production until I'd tested it ;-)
>
> > Works, but IIRC can cause problems at least < 9.4 because concurrent
> > cache builds might miss the pg_index row...
>
> If you're talking about SnapshotNow hazards, I think the risk would be
> minimal, and probably no worse than cases that the system will cause
> by itself.

Yes, SnapshotNow. I could reproduce it causing 'spurious' HOT updates
and missing index inserts a while back. And I don't think it's
comparable with normal modifications. Those either have a modification
blocking lock or use heap_inplace...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-07-11 15:26:21 Re: Is there a way to temporarily disable a index
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-07-11 15:20:08 Re: Is there a way to temporarily disable a index