Re: 9.5 CF1

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 9.5 CF1
Date: 2014-07-02 15:41:45
Message-ID: 20140702154144.GC7340@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:

> Minmax indexes
> Álvaro will respond to the design questions Heikki raised.

I'm currently reworking the patch so that things that need to be
abstract per discussion are abstract, without enlarging the scope
excessively. I'm working on an opclass implementation that can be used
for "sortable" datatypes, so that it covers the datatypes it covers
today (basically anything with a btree opclass). I don't intend to
implement opclasses for any other type, but with the design I expect to
have it should be possible to cover stuff like geometric types usefully.
(I guess it will be possible to index arrays in a general way also, but
I don't think it will be of any usefulness).

Once I post that version, I will focus on reviewing other patches, and
then maybe someone interested can try to implement other opclasses on
top of it, to ensure that the API I propose is sensible or at least
useful.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

  • Re: 9.5 CF1 at 2014-07-02 05:06:23 from Abhijit Menon-Sen

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2014-07-02 15:42:54 Re: RLS Design
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-07-02 15:25:57 Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels