| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Ryan Johnson <ryan(dot)johnson(at)cs(dot)utoronto(dot)ca> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Index-only scans and non-MVCC snapshots | 
| Date: | 2014-06-27 09:14:59 | 
| Message-ID: | 20140627091459.GA18584@awork2.anarazel.de | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On 2014-06-26 22:47:47 -0600, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> As part of a research project, I'm trying to change Read Committed isolation
> to use HeapTupleSatisfiesNow rather than acquiring a new snapshot at every
> command [1]. Things appear to have gone reasonably well so far, except
> certain queries fail with "ERROR:  non-MVCC snapshots are not supported in
> index-only scans."
You're aware that unless you employ additional locking you can simply
miss individual rows or see them several times because of concurrent
updates?
The reason it has worked (< 9.4) for system catalogs is that updates of
rows were only performed while objects were locked access exclusively -
that's the reason why some places in the code use inplace updates btw...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- 
 Andres Freund	                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2014-06-27 10:42:01 | Re: pg_resetxlog to clear backup start/end locations. | 
| Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2014-06-27 07:05:19 | Re: RLS Design |