From: | James Le Cuirot <chewi(at)aura-online(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Alternative to psql -c ? |
Date: | 2014-06-25 14:16:19 |
Message-ID: | 20140625151619.222505c0@red.yakaraplc.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:09:18 -0400
Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:43:25PM +0100, James Le Cuirot wrote:
>
> > The cookbook currently uses PQexec so multiple SQL commands are
> > wrapped in a transaction unless an explicit transaction
> > instruction appears. I don't want to change this behaviour but
> > the only way to get exactly the same effect from psql is to use
> > the -c option.
>
> Why not just read a file? -f filename.
>
> A
Same problem as stdin, the transactional behaviour is different. There
is the --single-transaction option but as the man page says...
"If the script itself uses BEGIN, COMMIT, or ROLLBACK, this option will
not have the desired effects."
Regards,
James
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2014-06-25 14:24:53 | Re: Alternative to psql -c ? |
Previous Message | Igor Neyman | 2014-06-25 13:46:10 | Re: Getting "cache lookup failed for aggregate" error |