Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins
Date: 2014-06-22 18:40:23
Message-ID: 20140622184023.GO30721@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-06-22 19:31:34 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Yes, that's roughly how the SLRU code works also, so sounds good.

Heh. I rather see that as an argument for it sounding bad :)

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2014-06-22 18:59:05 Re: SQL access to database attributes
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2014-06-22 18:31:34 Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins