Re: Atomics hardware support table & supported architectures

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Atomics hardware support table & supported architectures
Date: 2014-06-17 23:09:22
Message-ID: 20140617230922.GK18688@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> The release of version n doesn't mean that version n-1 is no longer
> supported.  As of today, this page:
>
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris10/overview/index-138972.html
>
> says:
>
> > The Oracle Solaris 9 operating system is now in the Extended
> > Support period of it's life cycle. Customers with support
> > contracts can still access patches and log new service requests,
> > although support contracts carry a surcharge for Oracle Solaris 9
> > support.

Most likely, people will not be installing Postgres 9.5 in that
platform, though, which is what matters for the purposes of the proposal
at hand.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-06-17 23:12:16 Re: pg_control is missing a field for LOBLKSIZE
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-06-17 23:09:12 Re: UPDATE SET (a,b,c) = (SELECT ...) versus rules