From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Atomics hardware support table & supported architectures |
Date: | 2014-06-17 23:09:22 |
Message-ID: | 20140617230922.GK18688@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> The release of version n doesn't mean that version n-1 is no longer
> supported. As of today, this page:
>
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris10/overview/index-138972.html
>
> says:
>
> > The Oracle Solaris 9 operating system is now in the Extended
> > Support period of it's life cycle. Customers with support
> > contracts can still access patches and log new service requests,
> > although support contracts carry a surcharge for Oracle Solaris 9
> > support.
Most likely, people will not be installing Postgres 9.5 in that
platform, though, which is what matters for the purposes of the proposal
at hand.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-06-17 23:12:16 | Re: pg_control is missing a field for LOBLKSIZE |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-06-17 23:09:12 | Re: UPDATE SET (a,b,c) = (SELECT ...) versus rules |