From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: updated emacs configuration |
Date: | 2014-06-12 18:18:10 |
Message-ID: | 20140612181810.GD686905@tornado.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:36:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:04:02PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> I'd consider just getting rid of the
> >>
> >> (c-file-style . "bsd")
> >>
> >> setting in .dir-locals.el and put the actual interesting settings from
> >> the style in there.
> >>
> >> Another alternative is to change emacs.samples to use
> >> hack-local-variables-hook instead, as described here:
> >> http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/LocalVariables
>
> > Those are reasonable alternatives. The ultimate effect looks similar for all
> > three options, to the extent that I don't see a basis for forming a strong
> > preference. Do you have a recommendation?
>
> The more Ludd^H^H^Hcautious among us run with
> (setq enable-local-variables nil)
> and would rather not see the configuration recommendations overcomplicated
> due to an attempt to play nice with directory-local settings we're ignoring
> anyway. So I'd vote for Peter's first option, ie, kluge up .dir-locals.el
> not the configuration code.
Seeing the two votes cast and only cosmetic differences between the options,
I'll just stick with my original -v1. Thanks.
--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2014-06-12 18:28:35 | Re: make check For Extensions |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2014-06-12 18:05:05 | Re: lo_create(oid, bytea) breaks every extant release of libpq |