Re: slotname vs slot_name

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: slotname vs slot_name
Date: 2014-06-05 11:04:30
Message-ID: 20140605110430.GI2789@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-06-05 20:02:38 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > We have:
> > * pg_ldecoding (Heikki)
> > * pg_lcse or pg_lcset (Petr)
> > * pg_logical (Andres)
> pg_decoding, simply?

I don't like it much, because it's pretty much restricted for data used
during decoding. So we'll potentially need a different directory for related
features (replication identifiers, apply, ...).

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2014-06-05 11:10:42 Re: slotname vs slot_name
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-06-05 11:02:38 Re: slotname vs slot_name