Re: recovery testing for beta

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: recovery testing for beta
Date: 2014-06-04 19:55:53
Message-ID: 20140604195553.GC785@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Jeff,

On 2014-05-29 09:39:56 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> What features in 9.4 need more beta testing for recovery?

Another thing I'd like to add to the list is wal_level=logical. Not such
much the logical decoding side, but that we haven't screwed up normal
crash recovery/wal replay.

> I also applied the foreign key test retroactively to 9.3, and it quickly
> re-found the multixact bugs up until commit 9a57858f1103b89a5674.

But you haven't found 1a917ae8610d44985f (master) / c0bd128c81c2b23a
(REL9_3_STABLE)? That's somewhat interesting...

Thanks for all the testing,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G Johnston 2014-06-04 20:07:32 Re: Sigh, we need an initdb
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-06-04 19:50:33 Re: Sigh, we need an initdb