From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Serge Negodyuck <petr(at)petrovich(dot)kiev(dot)ua> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #8673: Could not open file "pg_multixact/members/xxxx" on slave during hot_standby |
Date: | 2014-06-04 18:10:22 |
Message-ID: | 20140604181022.GQ5146@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I wasn't able to reproduce it that way, but I eventually figured out
> that if I altered altered the plpython function to grab a FOR NO KEY
> UPDATE lock first, insertion would grow the multixact beyond reasonable
> limits; see the attachment. If you then INSERT many tuples in "product"
> in a single transaction, the resulting xmax is a Multixact that has as
> many members as inserts there are, plus one.
Bah. I managed to submit a file with the lock_company() call commented
out in the plpython function. That one doesn't do anything interesting;
you need to uncomment that line.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gunnar "Nick" Bluth | 2014-06-04 18:14:36 | Re: BUG #10527: TRAP when joining local table with view on tds_fdw foreign table |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-06-04 18:06:07 | Re: BUG #10527: TRAP when joining local table with view on tds_fdw foreign table |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-06-04 18:50:39 | Re: Proposing pg_hibernate |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-06-04 17:57:19 | Re: pg_control is missing a field for LOBLKSIZE |