pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts
Date: 2014-05-30 12:16:31
Message-ID: 20140530121631.GE25431@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Hi,

When upgrading a < 9.3 cluster pg_upgrade doesn't bother to keep the old
multixacts around because they won't be read after the upgrade (and
aren't compatible). It just resets the new cluster's nextMulti to the
old + 1.
Unfortunately that means that there'll be a offsets/0000 file created by
initdb around. Sounds harmless enough, but that'll actually cause
problems if the old cluster had a nextMulti that's bigger than that
page.

When vac_truncate_clog() calls TruncateMultiXact() that'll scan
pg_multixact/offsets to find the earliest existing segment. That'll be
0000. If the to-be-truncated data is older than the last existing
segment it returns. Then it'll try to determine the last required data
in members/ by accessing the oldest data in offsets/.

Unfortunately, due to the existing 0000/ segment, that means it'll
sometimes try to access a nonexistant offsets/ file. Preventing vacuum
et al from succeeding.

It seems to me the fix for this is to a) rmtree("pg_multixact/members",
false) in copy_clog_xlog_xid() in the oldcluster < 9.3 case b) add a
warning to the release notes that everyone that used pg_upgrade and has
a 0000 file lying around should report to the mailinglist.

b) is a bit unsatisfactory, but I don't want to suggest removing the
file. In too many situations it might actually still be needed.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-05-30 12:20:05 Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-05-30 07:57:03 Re: BUG #10432: failed to re-find parent key in index