Re: SQL access to database attributes

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL access to database attributes
Date: 2014-05-26 05:10:41
Message-ID: 20140526051041.GU2556@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> I don't really object to doing an unlocked check for another such
> database, but I'm not convinced that additional locking to try to
> prevent a race is worth its keep.

+1 on the nannyism, and +1 to ignoring the race.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-05-26 05:16:55 Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-05-26 05:09:16 Re: 9.4 btree index corruption