Re: pg_upgrade fails: Mismatch of relation OID in database 8.4 -> 9.3

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Ross <jeff(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade fails: Mismatch of relation OID in database 8.4 -> 9.3
Date: 2014-05-21 20:37:13
Message-ID: 20140521203713.GB25449@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 04:23:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:56:59AM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
> >> Yes, using 9.3's pg_dump of 8.4 and applying it to both an 8.4 and a
> >> 9.3 cluster, the contact_email table now has toast in both 8.4 and
> >> 9.3.
>
> > So the big question is why doesn't the existing 8.4 table have a toast
> > table? Did you use pg_upgrade on the old cluster before, e.g. from 8.3?
>
> I have a vague recollection that we changed the calculations about whether
> a toast table would be needed, but I can't find it in the commit logs
> right now --- and anyway I think this was pre-8.4.

The only item I can think of that would cause this is someone changing
the length of a string. Did someone modify pg_attribute directly to
increase the length of one of the character columns?

I just tested ALTER TABLE in 8.4 and it does create a toast table for
this case in 9.4:

CREATE TABLE test (x CHAR(10));
ALTER TABLE test ALTER COLUMN x TYPE CHAR(8000);

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-05-21 20:37:46 Re: [9.3] Should we mention "set_config(...)" in 18.1.3 in Server Configuration?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-05-21 20:23:34 Re: pg_upgrade fails: Mismatch of relation OID in database 8.4 -> 9.3