| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Wanted: jsonb on-disk representation documentation |
| Date: | 2014-05-07 12:56:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20140507125646.GA13397@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-05-07 08:50:33 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > I don't think it's likely that beta1 will be binary compatible with the
> > final version at this point.
>
> I rather think we're not ready for beta1 at this point (but I expect
> to lose that argument).
Well, I guess it depends on what we define 'beta1' to be. Imo evaluating
problematic pieces of new code, locating unfinished pieces is part of
that. I don't see much point in forbidding incompatible changes in beta1
personally. That robs th the development cycle of the only period where
users can actually test the new version in a halfway sane manner and
report back with things that apparently broken.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2014-05-07 13:00:01 | Re: Wanted: jsonb on-disk representation documentation |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2014-05-07 12:56:29 | Re: Wanted: jsonb on-disk representation documentation |