Re: Docs for 9.4's worker_spi?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Docs for 9.4's worker_spi?
Date: 2014-05-06 03:53:09
Message-ID: 20140506035309.GS6018@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Seems there is no documentation for the 9.4 worker_spi contrib module. Is
> > this OK? The comment at the top of the C file says:
> >
> > * Sample background worker code that demonstrates various coding
> > * patterns: establishing a database connection; starting and committing
> > * transactions; using GUC variables, and heeding SIGHUP to reread
> > * the configuration file; reporting to pg_stat_activity; using the
> > * process latch to sleep and exit in case of postmaster death.
>
> worker_spi is not new in 9.4; it was added in 9.3 by Alvaro in commit
> da07a1e856511dca59cbb1357616e26baa64428e. I agree that it should be
> documented like all of the other contrib modules,

Uh. It's a code sample. I didn't ever consider documenting it was a
necessity, or I would have done it. I don't think it needs any
documentation now, either (in Docbook form I mean.)

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-05-06 04:28:37 Re: Per table autovacuum vacuum cost limit behaviour strange
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-05-06 03:47:10 Re: Docs for 9.4's worker_spi?