| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alfred Perlstein <alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, girgen(at)freebsd(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, ftigeot(at)wolfpond(dot)org, Tom Sparks <tgs(at)norse-corp(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |
| Date: | 2014-04-27 01:15:22 |
| Message-ID: | 20140427011522.GZ2556@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jim,
* Jim Nasby (jim(at)nasby(dot)net) wrote:
> On 4/22/14, 5:01 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >We also have colo space and power, etc. So this would be the whole deal. The cluster would be up for as long as needed.
> >
> >Are the machine specs sufficient? Any other things we should look for?
> >
> >CC'd Tom on this email.
>
> Did anyone respond to this off-list?
Yes, I did follow-up with Tom. I'll do so again, as the discussion had
died down.
> Would these machines be more useful as dedicated performance test servers for the community or generic BenchFarm members?
I don't believe they would be terribly useful as buildfarm systems; we
could set up similar systems with VMs to just run the regression tests.
Where I see these systems being particularly valuable would be as the
start of our performance farm, and perhaps one of the systems as a PG
infrastructure server.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alfred Perlstein | 2014-04-27 01:25:19 | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2014-04-27 00:28:11 | Re: Decrease MAX_BACKENDS to 2^16 |