Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net
Cc: sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org, girgen(at)FreeBSD(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, ftigeot(at)wolfpond(dot)org
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Date: 2014-04-22 01:08:45
Message-ID: 20140422.100845.845069674318199803.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> This is exactly why we need a benchfarm.
>
> I actually have a client working based on Greg Smith's pgbench tools.
>
> What we would need is a way to graph the results - that's something
> beyond my very rudimentary expertise in web programming. If anyone
> feels like collaborating I'd be glad to hear from them (The web site
> is programmed in perl + TemplateToolkit, but even that's not
> immutable. I'm open to using, say, node.js plus one of its templating
> engines.

gnuplot? (the graph I attached was created by gnuplt).

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-04-22 01:12:38 Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-04-22 01:06:35 Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD