Re: BUG #9136: pg_is_xlog_replay_paused() should not need Superuser

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: sys-milan(at)statpro(dot)com, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #9136: pg_is_xlog_replay_paused() should not need Superuser
Date: 2014-04-18 14:53:23
Message-ID: 20140418145323.GB28349@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 03:11:44PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Is this correct?  Do we have proper super-user restrictions on all the
> right fields now?
>
>
> I'm not sure what the security problem would be for allowing non-superusers to
> run pg_is_xlog_replay_paused(). And if there are none, there is no reason why
> the function should be restricted like that.
>
>  Also, looking at that specific documentation page, ISTM it needs a better way
> to show which functions actually *do* require superuser privileges. In some
> groups it states which do require it, and in some where it doesn't. Perhaps we
> should add a column to each of the tables with a yes/no value indicating if
> superuser is required for that specific function? Or at least have every table
> be prefixed by a statement saying which require superuser.

Well, right now we seem to have an inconsistent setup that is being
complained about regularly. Who can review it all and make a
recommendation? Should we just hold all this for 9.5?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message fburgess 2014-04-18 15:24:52 Re: Having trouble configuring a Master with multiple standby Servers in PostgreSQL 9.3.3
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2014-04-18 13:51:36 Re: BUG #9818: LDAP Authentication subtree problem