From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Need Multixact Freezing Docs |
Date: | 2014-04-16 20:45:38 |
Message-ID: | 20140416204538.GR5822@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>
> >>> You can see the current multixact value in pg_controldata output. Keep
> >>> timestamped values of that somewhere (a table?) so that you can measure
> >>> consumption rate. I don't think we provide SQL-level access to those
> >>> values.
> >>
> >> Bleh. Do we provide SQL-level access in 9.4? If not, I think that's a
> >> requirement before release.
> >
> > Yeah, good idea. Want to propose a patch?
>
> Yeah, lemme dig into this. I really think we need it for 9.4, feature
> frozen or not.
Great, thanks.
> josh=# select relname, age(relminmxid) from pg_class;
> relname | age
> -----------------------------------------+------------
> pg_statistic | 2147483647
> pg_type | 2147483647
> random | 2147483647
> dblink_pkey_results | 2147483647
> pg_toast_17395 | 2147483647
>
> ...
>
> So if age() doesn't mean anything, then how are users to know when the
> need to freeze?
I don't understand. Autovacuum will freeze this automatically when the
threshold is reached. Users don't need to do anything.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2014-04-16 20:47:29 | Re: bgworker crashed or not? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-04-16 20:39:42 | Re: Need Multixact Freezing Docs |